The "Bigger is Better" trend of banks, telecommunications firms, health
insurance providers, airlines, and almost every other industry, has enveloped
residential real estate companies as well. In case you haven't noticed,
there are only a handful of medium sized (150 to 300 agents) real estate
offices remaining in the Bay area.
Many companies feel they will be unable to effectively compete during
a time of dramatic changes in the business. The rationale given to the
public is that these mergers benefit the client with greater service, convenience,
value, and the power of a larger network. But, is bigger really always
better for you as a buyer or seller?
Your choice of both agent and company is important. When selecting
an agent, you will want to ensure he or she is associated with an established
firm that has a reputation for integrity.
Sometimes, when people tell me, "We're working with XYZ Realty," rather
than naming their Realtor, I get the feeling they do not really understand
the value of a top-notch agent. It is the agent, not the company, they
will be dealing with and talking to on a weekly, sometimes daily, basis.
Their agent is the one who will either have looked out for their best interests
— or let them down.
When agents do a good job, they win the loyalty of their clients. If
their experience was a good one, buyers and sellers tend to do repeat business
with the same agent, even if this means following him to his new company.
Different offices within the same firm will have different managers,
staff and agents. Within a company, large or small, some offices are bound
to be better than others. It therefore follows that your experience as
a buyer or seller will be dependent upon the quality of both the office
and the agent and not on the company name alone.
As a former sales manager of a large firm, I can testify from experience
that most companies recruit agents based on production (sales generated),
or potential production. Despite the rhetoric, client care and protection
is not a priority item in the hiring and retention of agents.
Residential real estate is a high-risk business with low profit margins;
therefore, it is not surprising that companies want to expand their opportunities
for profit by creating or partnering in ancillary businesses.
These include mortgage companies, homeowner's insurance, title and escrow
services, moving companies, corporate relocation, and others. This is the
one stop shopping that some busy clients find convenient. Convenience,
however, may come at a higher cost than shopping around for these same
services.
There is some concern that pressure from large companies to push their
related services could create a conflict of interest for agents torn between
the needs of their company and the needs of their clients. This is especially
true if the agent receives compensation for these referrals.
I do not know any Realtors who are employees; all are independent contractors.
That means they work on commission only. They get neither salary nor benefits.
Without closed sales, there are no paychecks.
The operant word here is independent. They are "supervised" only in
the sense of doing business ethically and in a manner legally mandated
by the state. Real estate salespeople come and go as they please; they
do not take orders on what to do or when to do it. They are in their own
business. Agents share commissions with their broker in exchange for using
office facilities, staff and supplies.
Salespeople can leave a company or be asked to leave at any time. Despite
what you may assume, a higher commission split is not the number one reason
why most agents move to other companies. The two most important motivations
are, 1) to work in a positive, energetic environment with other high-level
professionals; and 2) to receive support and recognition from their manager
and the office staff.
The most enlightened companies realize their job is to provide for both
their clients and agents. Some in the industry question whether mega-organizations,
with staff and headquarters thousands of miles away, will act as though
the company were more important than the individual agent. In the past,
this has lead to high agent turnover.
Recently, about 100 agents from an office of one company all switched
to another broker on the same day. This coincided with their original firm's
merger, which obviously did not please them.
A slowly evolving shift in the business is the move toward offering
clients a menu of services, each with its own fee. For example, earlier
this year a buyer was referred to me who was purchasing a rental home directly
from the owner. He wanted my services as a consultant in drafting a purchase
contract and advice on items he needed to consider.
This buyer personally knew a Realtor from a large, local firm and had
originally asked him to assist on a consulting basis. The agent had to
refuse because his company would not allow it; it had its guidelines and
consulting was not part of its services. Business was lost by the larger
company because of a lack of flexibility.
As technology increases the availability of information for those not
in the business, I believe the public will increasingly insist on paying
only for the services it needs, not on what companies mandate. The survivors
will be those who adapt to client needs.
The slow market of the first half of the 1990s caused a shakeout of
agents. California Association of Realtors (CAR) membership decreased dramatically
from approximately 150,000 in the late 1980s to today's figure of 92,000.
Although the current active market has brought more agents into
real estate, it is doubtful that former levels will return. Technology
now allows each agent to handle substantially more business than was previously
possible.
Paradoxically, the technology that has impelled the trend to bigness
will also allow smaller operations to flourish. Even a one-person office
can have numerous listings advertised on a sharp Web page, belying its
size.
Like farmers forming cooperatives, smaller offices are getting together
to pool their buying power for classified advertising, training, business
forms and other supplies. When the dust settles, I believe well managed
companies of all sizes will survive and prosper.
Real estate is a personal business that requires individual service.
For buyers and sellers, the type and cost of services will change in the
future, but not the need for quality. Choose your agent carefully according
to your needs, not by the size of his or her company.
How
To Interview Agents - Part 1, Part
2, Part 3, and Part
4 and Use Local Agent.
|