A home that looks good, even if almost new, could still have serious
problems. In addition to inspections, there is a simple thing buyers can
do to avoid nasty surprises — check its permit history at the city or county.
Although it is a good idea for a buyer to do so soon after his offer
is accepted, this common sense action is rarely taken. The investment of
an hour or two in research can yield invaluable information about the desirability
of a particular property.
Recently, I represented a buyer in the purchase of an expensive home
in a million dollar neighborhood. A high price, however, is no guarantee
that you are buying a trouble-free house.
The home is only three years old. The original structure had been destroyed
in the 1991 Oakland hills fire. Shortly after the contract was ratified,
but before our general home inspection, I accompanied the buyer to the
City of Oakland to review permits.
We were given a computer printout of all permits for this address. Everything
had received final approval except the sewer line. When I questioned city
staff about this, I was told this was common. They explained that sewer
permits often do not get finaled.
I saw this as a red flag. Was the sewer line done correctly and to code
or were some relevant steps skipped because the city had not come back
to verify? I suggested that the buyer invest in a sewer line inspection,
including running a video camera down the pipes.
To my amazement, the inspector was unable to camera the line because
there was no cleanout. In other words, if the line backed up, there would
be no simple way to clear it. The sewer inspector showed me how the home
next door, built about the same time, had two cleanouts in the front.
Equally troubling was the discovery that the sewer pipe under the house
was only two inches in diameter. Four inches would have been preferable,
but three inches is the smallest acceptable size in new construction.
This was of special concern because all sewage for three and one-half
bathrooms was pumped up from underneath the house, way down on the street
below. To compound matters, the pump was inadequate and leaking.
As is often the case, the seller had no idea there was any problem with
the sewer system in her lovely, upscale home. Regardless, one day, when
her shower or toilet backed up, the buyer would have found she had an expensive
problem. This did not prevent the escrow from closing. Just the same, the
buyer was glad to know about it from the beginning.
Several years ago, I was the selling (buyer’s) agent in the sale of
a charming, 1920s home. My buyers and I received an interesting surprise
when reading the city records. More than thirty years earlier, this house
had been relocated to its present location from somewhere else in the city.
The sellers, who had lived there six years, had no idea this was the
case. Their listing agent had also sold them the home, but the permits
had not been perused. Fortunately, the fact it had been moved was actually
good news.
It meant this older house had a 1960s foundation meeting the higher
standards from that era, rather than its original foundation with its potential
problems. I shared this vital finding with the home inspector, and he found
it quite helpful. Needless to say, the buyers were pleased we made the
extra effort.
Sellers are not required to assemble a history of permits on their
property for prospective buyers. They are obligated, nevertheless, to notify
buyers in writing of any work done, especially if it was without permits
or not to code. Sellers normally know only about what has happened since
they have been owners, and whatever the previous owner has told them.
Think of the permit history as clues in a mystery, where questions still
need to be answered. Despite the fact that city/county records are usually
incomplete, they still fill in gaps in the saga of a house. A personal
visit to the city could mean the difference between a happy or unhappy
ending to your home buying story.
Condition
is Critical and Are Permits Important?
|